|
Hi Dave,
I hope my following comments aren’t too presumptuous as I’m not an active participant in OSCAR racing.
I’ve read your proposal re: Super 16D motors with keen interest. I’ve been involved in model car racing ever since the early ‘60’s, I say “model car” because I’ve always been involved in the hobby through clubs that have been focused exclusively on scale cars AND landscaped tracks. I’ve never been involved in the commercial side where I’ve sadly seen arguments about motors being most divisive and ultimately destructive to that community.
A unique feature about clubs I've been a member of is that members eagerly accepted very specific rules covering motor performance- inexpensive Mid- performing stock motors were de rigueur. In my experience club members become close friends sharing some very specific ideas about what model car racing was all about. A member who cheated was profoundly insulting his fellow members by being completely disrespectful and dishonest.
I’ve seen, especially from those whose slot car racing started on commercial tracks, folk who believe that a good racing program must necessarily involve the opportunities to “tweak,” improve, modify, and rebuild motors since with hot motors they believe lie the singular key to being the fastest and thus the “winningest.” And as we all know the faster a motor is rebuilt or built the more expensive becomes the quest for speed.
For some seeking more powerful motors comes the inevitable desire to win at whatever it takes, which inevitably leads to cheating. Some believe that “cheating” is an amoral matter because it’s just another though more clever, often hidden means to achieve the end- which in racing is to be the fastest.
But everything has its price. Motor performance enhancement leads to flat out, cynical rule breaking by folk being just too clever by half. What results are unhappy racers who feel they are being taken advantage when “motor improvements” are done in secret contrary to the spirit or the letter of a rule. Those who can’t afford $50-$100 motors are invariably relegated to the back of the pack with no equal or fair opportunity to ever be competitive.
Cheating or outspending others divides a group into happy haves and unhappy have-nots. Division seeps into the organization with the result that participation declines and the organization withers. Motor cheating, in my experience and from my observations, damages most any slot car racing program.
I’ve been racing at PPS since 1994 where we use stock 16D motors and only use stock Super 1D’s with NASCARs and Super Stock class cars (models of 1960’s cars). During 14 years we’ve suffered only one individual who wouldn’t accept the rules limiting motor performance. He’s gone.
I believe our vitality firmly rests on the idea that chassis design and building determines a winning car. What matters on the track i.e. what members are competing to determine... is who can build the fastest chassis.
Motor performance is not the issue. We've taken motors and their costs out of the equation. Everyone happily races with relatively equal cheap horsepower. The rules are very "limited" with respect to motors, and "unlimited" about chassis rules.
I think your call to boycotting races Super 16D motors is a dramatic, sharp call to focus everyone's attention on the issues of cheating. From my perspective the best racing is achieved with inexpensive stock motors. You are designing and providing chassis that level the playing field. The more equal the cars are, the more competative everyone has the opportunity to be- the more, the merrier, they say.
anonymous racer
|